| Title |
Editorial Peer Reviewers' Recommendations at a General Medical Journal: Are They Reliable and Do Editors Care?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, April 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0010072 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Richard L. Kravitz, Peter Franks, Mitchell D. Feldman, Martha Gerrity, Cindy Byrne, William M. Tierney |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 14% |
| United States | 2 | 14% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 7% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 7% |
| Poland | 1 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| Egypt | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 7 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 6 | 43% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Chile | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 71 | 85% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 23% |
| Researcher | 14 | 17% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 26 | 31% |
| Unknown | 5 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 17% |
| Computer Science | 12 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 13% |
| Psychology | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 19% |
| Unknown | 12 | 14% |