↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Quantification of Rapid Myosin Regulatory Light Chain Phosphorylation Using High-Throughput In-Cell Western Assays: Comparison to Western Immunoblots

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
Title
Quantification of Rapid Myosin Regulatory Light Chain Phosphorylation Using High-Throughput In-Cell Western Assays: Comparison to Western Immunoblots
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0009965
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hector N. Aguilar, Barbara Zielnik, Curtis N. Tracey, Bryan F. Mitchell

Abstract

Quantification of phospho-proteins (PPs) is crucial when studying cellular signaling pathways. Western immunoblotting (WB) is commonly used for the measurement of relative levels of signaling intermediates in experimental samples. However, WB is in general a labour-intensive and low-throughput technique. Because of variability in protein yield and phospho-signal preservation during protein harvesting, and potential loss of antigen during protein transfer, WB provides only semi-quantitative data. By comparison, the "in-cell western" (ICW) technique has high-throughput capacity and requires less extensive sample preparation. Thus, we compared the ICW technique to WB for measuring phosphorylated myosin regulatory light chain (PMLC(20)) in primary cultures of uterine myocytes to assess their relative specificity, sensitivity, precision, and quantification of biologically relevant responses.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Brazil 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Finland 1 1%
Unknown 76 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 26%
Researcher 15 18%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Master 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 15 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 5%
Chemistry 4 5%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 17 21%