↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Emotion Separation Is Completed Early and It Depends on Visual Field Presentation

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
Title
Emotion Separation Is Completed Early and It Depends on Visual Field Presentation
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0009790
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lichan Liu, Andreas A. Ioannides

Abstract

It is now apparent that the visual system reacts to stimuli very fast, with many brain areas activated within 100 ms. It is, however, unclear how much detail is extracted about stimulus properties in the early stages of visual processing. Here, using magnetoencephalography we show that the visual system separates different facial expressions of emotion well within 100 ms after image onset, and that this separation is processed differently depending on where in the visual field the stimulus is presented. Seven right-handed males participated in a face affect recognition experiment in which they viewed happy, fearful and neutral faces. Blocks of images were shown either at the center or in one of the four quadrants of the visual field. For centrally presented faces, the emotions were separated fast, first in the right superior temporal sulcus (STS; 35-48 ms), followed by the right amygdala (57-64 ms) and medial pre-frontal cortex (83-96 ms). For faces presented in the periphery, the emotions were separated first in the ipsilateral amygdala and contralateral STS. We conclude that amygdala and STS likely play a different role in early visual processing, recruiting distinct neural networks for action: the amygdala alerts sub-cortical centers for appropriate autonomic system response for fight or flight decisions, while the STS facilitates more cognitive appraisal of situations and links appropriate cortical sites together. It is then likely that different problems may arise when either network fails to initiate or function properly.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Belgium 2 2%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 100 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 19%
Student > Master 22 19%
Researcher 16 14%
Professor 11 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 9%
Other 23 20%
Unknown 9 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 49 43%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 10%
Neuroscience 11 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 9%
Engineering 5 4%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 13 12%