↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Medicaid Coverage for Tobacco Dependence Treatments in Massachusetts and Associated Decreases in Smoking Prevalence

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
Title
Medicaid Coverage for Tobacco Dependence Treatments in Massachusetts and Associated Decreases in Smoking Prevalence
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0009770
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas Land, Donna Warner, Mark Paskowsky, Ayesha Cammaerts, LeAnn Wetherell, Rachel Kaufmann, Lei Zhang, Ann Malarcher, Terry Pechacek, Lois Keithly

Abstract

Approximately 50% of smokers die prematurely from tobacco-related diseases. In July 2006, the Massachusetts health care reform law mandated tobacco cessation coverage for the Massachusetts Medicaid population. The new benefit included behavioral counseling and all medications approved for tobacco cessation treatment by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Between July 1, 2006 and December 31, 2008, a total of 70,140 unique Massachusetts Medicaid subscribers used the newly available benefit, which is approximately 37% of all Massachusetts Medicaid smokers. Given the high utilization rate, the objective of this study is to determine if smoking prevalence decreased significantly after the initiation of tobacco cessation coverage.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Denmark 1 2%
Unknown 54 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 14%
Student > Master 8 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 10 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 14 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 7%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 14 25%