↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Open Space Loss and Land Inequality in United States' Cities, 1990–2000

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
183 Mendeley
Title
Open Space Loss and Land Inequality in United States' Cities, 1990–2000
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0009509
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert I. McDonald, Richard T. T. Forman, Peter Kareiva

Abstract

Urban growth reduces open space in and around cities, impacting biodiversity and ecosystem services. Using land-cover and population data, we examined land consumption and open space loss between 1990 and 2000 for all 274 metropolitan areas in the contiguous United States. Nationally, 1.4 million ha of open space was lost, and the amount lost in a given city was correlated with population growth (r(272) = 0.85, P<0.001). In 2000, cities varied in per capita land consumption by an order of magnitude, from 459 m(2)/person in New York to 5393 m(2)/person in Grand Forks, ND. The per capita land consumption (m(2)/person) of most cities decreased on average over the decade from 1,564 to 1,454 m(2)/person, but there was substantial regional variation and some cities even increased. Cities with greater conservation funding or more reform-minded zoning tended to decrease in per capita land consumption more than other cities. The majority of developed area in cities is in low-density neighborhoods housing a small proportion of urban residents, with Gini coefficients that quantify this developed land inequality averaging 0.63. Our results suggest conservation funding and reform-minded zoning decrease per capita open space loss.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 170 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 20%
Student > Master 25 14%
Student > Bachelor 21 11%
Researcher 17 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 6%
Other 33 18%
Unknown 40 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 53 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 11%
Social Sciences 18 10%
Design 9 5%
Engineering 6 3%
Other 29 16%
Unknown 48 26%