↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

An Investigation into the Cognition Behind Spontaneous String Pulling in New Caledonian Crows

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
1 X user
reddit
1 Redditor
video
2 YouTube creators

Readers on

mendeley
194 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
An Investigation into the Cognition Behind Spontaneous String Pulling in New Caledonian Crows
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0009345
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alex H. Taylor, Felipe S. Medina, Jennifer C. Holzhaider, Lindsay J. Hearne, Gavin R. Hunt, Russell D. Gray

Abstract

The ability of some bird species to pull up meat hung on a string is a famous example of spontaneous animal problem solving. The "insight" hypothesis claims that this complex behaviour is based on cognitive abilities such as mental scenario building and imagination. An operant conditioning account, in contrast, would claim that this spontaneity is due to each action in string pulling being reinforced by the meat moving closer and remaining closer to the bird on the perch. We presented experienced and naïve New Caledonian crows with a novel, visually restricted string-pulling problem that reduced the quality of visual feedback during string pulling. Experienced crows solved this problem with reduced efficiency and increased errors compared to their performance in standard string pulling. Naïve crows either failed or solved the problem by trial and error learning. However, when visual feedback was available via a mirror mounted next to the apparatus, two naïve crows were able to perform at the same level as the experienced group. Our results raise the possibility that spontaneous string pulling in New Caledonian crows may not be based on insight but on operant conditioning mediated by a perceptual-motor feedback cycle.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 4%
United Kingdom 5 3%
Austria 3 2%
Russia 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 168 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 17%
Student > Bachelor 33 17%
Student > Master 32 16%
Professor 16 8%
Other 26 13%
Unknown 19 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 85 44%
Psychology 53 27%
Environmental Science 8 4%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Arts and Humanities 4 2%
Other 14 7%
Unknown 25 13%