↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Development and Field Evaluation of a Synthetic Mosquito Lure That Is More Attractive than Humans

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
patent
2 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
163 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
244 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Development and Field Evaluation of a Synthetic Mosquito Lure That Is More Attractive than Humans
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0008951
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fredros O. Okumu, Gerry F. Killeen, Sheila Ogoma, Lubandwa Biswaro, Renate C. Smallegange, Edgar Mbeyela, Emmanuel Titus, Cristina Munk, Hassan Ngonyani, Willem Takken, Hassan Mshinda, Wolfgang R. Mukabana, Sarah J. Moore

Abstract

Disease transmitting mosquitoes locate humans and other blood hosts by identifying their characteristic odor profiles. Using their olfactory organs, the mosquitoes detect compounds present in human breath, sweat and skins, and use these as cues to locate and obtain blood from the humans. These odor compounds can be synthesized in vitro, then formulated to mimic humans. While some synthetic mosquito lures already exist, evidence supporting their utility is limited to laboratory settings, where long-range stimuli cannot be investigated.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 244 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 235 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 60 25%
Student > Master 48 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 19%
Student > Bachelor 20 8%
Other 12 5%
Other 26 11%
Unknown 31 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 112 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 10%
Environmental Science 22 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 4%
Engineering 9 4%
Other 34 14%
Unknown 32 13%