↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Common Premotor Regions for the Perception and Production of Prosody and Correlations with Empathy and Prosodic Ability

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
226 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
Title
Common Premotor Regions for the Perception and Production of Prosody and Correlations with Empathy and Prosodic Ability
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0008759
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lisa Aziz-Zadeh, Tong Sheng, Anahita Gheytanchi

Abstract

Prosody, the melody and intonation of speech, involves the rhythm, rate, pitch and voice quality to relay linguistic and emotional information from one individual to another. A significant component of human social communication depends upon interpreting and responding to another person's prosodic tone as well as one's own ability to produce prosodic speech. However there has been little work on whether the perception and production of prosody share common neural processes, and if so, how these might correlate with individual differences in social ability.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 226 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Germany 3 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Estonia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Unknown 210 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 51 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 22%
Student > Master 23 10%
Student > Bachelor 22 10%
Student > Postgraduate 12 5%
Other 43 19%
Unknown 26 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 85 38%
Neuroscience 27 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 8%
Linguistics 15 7%
Other 23 10%
Unknown 37 16%