↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Moonlight Makes Owls More Chatty

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
173 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Moonlight Makes Owls More Chatty
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0008696
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vincenzo Penteriani, María del Mar Delgado, Letizia Campioni, Rui Lourenço

Abstract

Lunar cycles seem to affect many of the rhythms, temporal patterns and behaviors of living things on Earth. Ambient light is known to affect visual communication in animals, with the conspicuousness of visual signals being largely determined by the light available for reflection by the sender. Although most previous studies in this context have focused on diurnal light, moonlight should not be neglected from the perspective of visual communication among nocturnal species. We recently discovered that eagle owls Bubo bubo communicate with conspecifics using a patch of white throat plumage that is repeatedly exposed during each call and is only visible during vocal displays.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 3 2%
Portugal 2 1%
Chile 2 1%
France 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Slovakia 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 155 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 17%
Student > Master 22 13%
Student > Bachelor 21 12%
Other 13 8%
Other 28 16%
Unknown 25 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 95 55%
Environmental Science 20 12%
Unspecified 6 3%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Engineering 4 2%
Other 12 7%
Unknown 31 18%