↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

A Statistical Method for the Detection of Alternative Splicing Using RNA-Seq

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
231 Mendeley
citeulike
18 CiteULike
connotea
3 Connotea
Title
A Statistical Method for the Detection of Alternative Splicing Using RNA-Seq
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0008529
Pubmed ID
Authors

Liguo Wang, Yuanxin Xi, Jun Yu, Liping Dong, Laising Yen, Wei Li

Abstract

Deep sequencing of transcriptome (RNA-seq) provides unprecedented opportunity to interrogate plausible mRNA splicing patterns by mapping RNA-seq reads to exon junctions (thereafter junction reads). In most previous studies, exon junctions were detected by using the quantitative information of junction reads. The quantitative criterion (e.g. minimum of two junction reads), although is straightforward and widely used, usually results in high false positive and false negative rates, owning to the complexity of transcriptome. Here, we introduced a new metric, namely Minimal Match on Either Side of exon junction (MMES), to measure the quality of each junction read, and subsequently implemented an empirical statistical model to detect exon junctions. When applied to a large dataset (>200M reads) consisting of mouse brain, liver and muscle mRNA sequences, and using independent transcripts databases as positive control, our method was proved to be considerably more accurate than previous ones, especially for detecting junctions originated from low-abundance transcripts. Our results were also confirmed by real time RT-PCR assay. The MMES metric can be used either in this empirical statistical model or in other more sophisticated classifiers, such as logistic regression.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 231 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 14 6%
Germany 4 2%
United Kingdom 3 1%
France 3 1%
Norway 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Other 9 4%
Unknown 188 81%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 92 40%
Student > Ph. D. Student 62 27%
Student > Master 17 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 13 6%
Other 8 3%
Other 26 11%
Unknown 13 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 158 68%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 10%
Computer Science 13 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 4%
Environmental Science 3 1%
Other 10 4%
Unknown 15 6%