↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

A Comparison of the Wellbeing of Orphans and Abandoned Children Ages 6–12 in Institutional and Community-Based Care Settings in 5 Less Wealthy Nations

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
126 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
212 Mendeley
Title
A Comparison of the Wellbeing of Orphans and Abandoned Children Ages 6–12 in Institutional and Community-Based Care Settings in 5 Less Wealthy Nations
Published in
PLOS ONE, December 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0008169
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kathryn Whetten, Jan Ostermann, Rachel A. Whetten, Brian W. Pence, Karen O'Donnell, Lynne C. Messer, Nathan M. Thielman, The Positive Outcomes for Orphans Research Team

Abstract

Leaders are struggling to care for the estimated 143,000,000 orphans and millions more abandoned children worldwide. Global policy makers are advocating that institution-living orphans and abandoned children (OAC) be moved as quickly as possible to a residential family setting and that institutional care be used as a last resort. This analysis tests the hypothesis that institutional care for OAC aged 6-12 is associated with worse health and wellbeing than community residential care using conservative two-tail tests.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Bangladesh 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Unknown 205 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 36 17%
Student > Master 35 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 14 7%
Other 45 21%
Unknown 48 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 47 22%
Psychology 44 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 42 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 2%
Other 14 7%
Unknown 55 26%