↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Reaction Factoring and Bipartite Update Graphs Accelerate the Gillespie Algorithm for Large-Scale Biochemical Systems

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Reaction Factoring and Bipartite Update Graphs Accelerate the Gillespie Algorithm for Large-Scale Biochemical Systems
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0008125
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sagar Indurkhya, Jacob Beal

Abstract

ODE simulations of chemical systems perform poorly when some of the species have extremely low concentrations. Stochastic simulation methods, which can handle this case, have been impractical for large systems due to computational complexity. We observe, however, that when modeling complex biological systems: (1) a small number of reactions tend to occur a disproportionately large percentage of the time, and (2) a small number of species tend to participate in a disproportionately large percentage of reactions. We exploit these properties in LOLCAT Method, a new implementation of the Gillespie Algorithm. First, factoring reaction propensities allows many propensities dependent on a single species to be updated in a single operation. Second, representing dependencies between reactions with a bipartite graph of reactions and species requires only storage for reactions, rather than the required for a graph that includes only reactions. Together, these improvements allow our implementation of LOLCAT Method to execute orders of magnitude faster than currently existing Gillespie Algorithm variants when simulating several yeast MAPK cascade models.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 9%
Italy 2 9%
United States 1 4%
Unknown 18 78%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 22%
Student > Master 4 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 1 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 8 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 22%
Mathematics 3 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 9%
Engineering 2 9%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 1 4%