↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

The Real maccoyii: Identifying Tuna Sushi with DNA Barcodes – Contrasting Characteristic Attributes and Genetic Distances

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
6 blogs
twitter
13 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
263 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
Title
The Real maccoyii: Identifying Tuna Sushi with DNA Barcodes – Contrasting Characteristic Attributes and Genetic Distances
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0007866
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jacob H. Lowenstein, George Amato, Sergios-Orestis Kolokotronis

Abstract

The use of DNA barcodes for the identification of described species is one of the least controversial and most promising applications of barcoding. There is no consensus, however, as to what constitutes an appropriate identification standard and most barcoding efforts simply attempt to pair a query sequence with reference sequences and deem identification successful if it falls within the bounds of some pre-established cutoffs using genetic distance. Since the Renaissance, however, most biological classification schemes have relied on the use of diagnostic characters to identify and place species.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 263 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 3%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 240 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 70 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 22%
Student > Master 28 11%
Student > Bachelor 23 9%
Other 18 7%
Other 43 16%
Unknown 24 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 148 56%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 10%
Environmental Science 23 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 3%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Other 23 9%
Unknown 30 11%