↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

In-Group Conformity Sustains Different Foraging Traditions in Capuchin Monkeys (Cebus apella)

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
105 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
148 Mendeley
Title
In-Group Conformity Sustains Different Foraging Traditions in Capuchin Monkeys (Cebus apella)
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0007858
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marietta Dindo, Andrew Whiten, Frans B. M. de Waal

Abstract

Decades of research have revealed rich cultural repertoires encompassing multiple traditions in wild great apes, a picture crucially complemented by experimental simulations with captive apes. Studies with wild capuchin monkeys, the most encephalized simian species, have indicated a New World convergence on these cultural phenomena, involving multiple traditions and tool use. However, experimental studies to date are in conflict with such findings in concluding that capuchins, like other monkeys, show minimal capacities for social learning.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
United States 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 137 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 18%
Student > Master 23 16%
Student > Bachelor 22 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 26 18%
Unknown 12 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 54 36%
Psychology 41 28%
Social Sciences 15 10%
Neuroscience 6 4%
Environmental Science 5 3%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 18 12%