↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Quality and Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies in TB, HIV and Malaria: Evaluation Using QUADAS and STARD Standards

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
Title
Quality and Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies in TB, HIV and Malaria: Evaluation Using QUADAS and STARD Standards
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0007753
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patricia Scolari Fontela, Nitika Pant Pai, Ian Schiller, Nandini Dendukuri, Andrew Ramsay, Madhukar Pai

Abstract

Poor methodological quality and reporting are known concerns with diagnostic accuracy studies. In 2003, the QUADAS tool and the STARD standards were published for evaluating the quality and improving the reporting of diagnostic studies, respectively. However, it is unclear whether these tools have been applied to diagnostic studies of infectious diseases. We performed a systematic review on the methodological and reporting quality of diagnostic studies in TB, malaria and HIV.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 2 2%
Uganda 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 103 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 25%
Student > Master 19 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 12%
Other 11 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 9%
Other 21 19%
Unknown 9 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 48%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 5%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 16 14%