↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Dominance, Politics, and Physiology: Voters' Testosterone Changes on the Night of the 2008 United States Presidential Election

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
twitter
71 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
109 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
Title
Dominance, Politics, and Physiology: Voters' Testosterone Changes on the Night of the 2008 United States Presidential Election
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0007543
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steven J. Stanton, Jacinta C. Beehner, Ekjyot K. Saini, Cynthia M. Kuhn, Kevin S. LaBar

Abstract

Political elections are dominance competitions. When men win a dominance competition, their testosterone levels rise or remain stable to resist a circadian decline; and when they lose, their testosterone levels fall. However, it is unknown whether this pattern of testosterone change extends beyond interpersonal competitions to the vicarious experience of winning or losing in the context of political elections. Women's testosterone responses to dominance competition outcomes are understudied, and to date, a clear pattern of testosterone changes in response to winning and losing dominance competitions has not emerged.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 71 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 6%
Netherlands 3 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Italy 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 108 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 24%
Researcher 20 16%
Student > Master 17 13%
Other 9 7%
Student > Bachelor 8 6%
Other 30 23%
Unknown 13 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 41 32%
Social Sciences 24 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 5%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 19 15%