↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

The Cultural Dynamics of Copycat Suicide

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
80 X users
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
214 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
The Cultural Dynamics of Copycat Suicide
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0007252
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alex Mesoudi

Abstract

The observation that suicides sometimes cluster in space and/or time has led to suggestions that these clusters are caused by the social learning of suicide-related behaviours, or "copycat suicides". Point clusters are clusters of suicides localised in both time and space, and have been attributed to direct social learning from nearby individuals. Mass clusters are clusters of suicides localised in time but not space, and have been attributed to the dissemination of information concerning celebrity suicides via the mass media. Here, agent-based simulations, in combination with scan statistic methods for detecting clusters of rare events, were used to clarify the social learning processes underlying point and mass clusters. It was found that social learning between neighbouring agents did generate point clusters as predicted, although this effect was partially mimicked by homophily (individuals preferentially assorting with similar others). The one-to-many transmission dynamics characterised by the mass media were shown to generate mass clusters, but only where social learning was weak, perhaps due to prestige bias (only copying prestigious celebrities) and similarity bias (only copying similar models) acting to reduce the subset of available models. These findings can help to clarify and formalise existing hypotheses and to guide future empirical work relating to real-life copycat suicides.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 80 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 2%
United States 4 2%
Portugal 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 196 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 20%
Researcher 32 15%
Student > Master 28 13%
Student > Bachelor 28 13%
Other 12 6%
Other 40 19%
Unknown 32 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 51 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 33 15%
Social Sciences 31 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 8%
Arts and Humanities 8 4%
Other 36 17%
Unknown 38 18%