↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Use of Cumulative Incidence of Novel Influenza A/H1N1 in Foreign Travelers to Estimate Lower Bounds on Cumulative Incidence in Mexico

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
18 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
Use of Cumulative Incidence of Novel Influenza A/H1N1 in Foreign Travelers to Estimate Lower Bounds on Cumulative Incidence in Mexico
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0006895
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marc Lipsitch, Martin Lajous, Justin J. O'Hagan, Ted Cohen, Joel C. Miller, Edward Goldstein, Leon Danon, Jacco Wallinga, Steven Riley, Scott F. Dowell, Carrie Reed, Meg McCarron

Abstract

An accurate estimate of the total number of cases and severity of illness of an emerging infectious disease is required both to define the burden of the epidemic and to determine the severity of disease. When a novel pathogen first appears, affected individuals with severe symptoms are more likely to be diagnosed. Accordingly, the total number of cases will be underestimated and disease severity overestimated. This problem is manifest in the current epidemic of novel influenza A/H1N1.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Israel 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Afghanistan 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 54 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Student > Master 7 12%
Other 11 18%
Unknown 4 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 18%
Mathematics 6 10%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 14 23%
Unknown 10 17%