↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Re-Shuffling of Species with Climate Disruption: A No-Analog Future for California Birds?

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
333 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Re-Shuffling of Species with Climate Disruption: A No-Analog Future for California Birds?
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0006825
Pubmed ID
Authors

Diana Stralberg, Dennis Jongsomjit, Christine A. Howell, Mark A. Snyder, John D. Alexander, John A. Wiens, Terry L. Root

Abstract

By facilitating independent shifts in species' distributions, climate disruption may result in the rapid development of novel species assemblages that challenge the capacity of species to co-exist and adapt. We used a multivariate approach borrowed from paleoecology to quantify the potential change in California terrestrial breeding bird communities based on current and future species-distribution models for 60 focal species. Projections of future no-analog communities based on two climate models and two species-distribution-model algorithms indicate that by 2070 over half of California could be occupied by novel assemblages of bird species, implying the potential for dramatic community reshuffling and altered patterns of species interactions. The expected percentage of no-analog bird communities was dependent on the community scale examined, but consistent geographic patterns indicated several locations that are particularly likely to host novel bird communities in the future. These no-analog areas did not always coincide with areas of greatest projected species turnover. Efforts to conserve and manage biodiversity could be substantially improved by considering not just future changes in the distribution of individual species, but including the potential for unprecedented changes in community composition and unanticipated consequences of novel species assemblages.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 333 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 15 5%
Switzerland 3 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 300 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 118 35%
Student > Ph. D. Student 75 23%
Student > Master 31 9%
Other 20 6%
Student > Bachelor 15 5%
Other 48 14%
Unknown 26 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 171 51%
Environmental Science 103 31%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 <1%
Computer Science 3 <1%
Other 12 4%
Unknown 32 10%