↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Relativity Theory and Time Perception: Single or Multiple Clocks?

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
216 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
Title
Relativity Theory and Time Perception: Single or Multiple Clocks?
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0006268
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catalin V. Buhusi, Warren H. Meck

Abstract

Current theories of interval timing assume that humans and other animals time as if using a single, absolute stopwatch that can be stopped or reset on command. Here we evaluate the alternative view that psychological time is represented by multiple clocks, and that these clocks create separate temporal contexts by which duration is judged in a relative manner. Two predictions of the multiple-clock hypothesis were tested. First, that the multiple clocks can be manipulated (stopped and/or reset) independently. Second, that an event of a given physical duration would be perceived as having different durations in different temporal contexts, i.e., would be judged differently by each clock.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 216 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 3%
Canada 3 1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Other 6 3%
Unknown 189 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 48 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 19%
Student > Bachelor 26 12%
Student > Master 19 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 8%
Other 39 18%
Unknown 25 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 67 31%
Neuroscience 37 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 7%
Computer Science 12 6%
Other 19 9%
Unknown 36 17%