↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Sport Hunting, Predator Control and Conservation of Large Carnivores

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
167 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
675 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Sport Hunting, Predator Control and Conservation of Large Carnivores
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0005941
Pubmed ID
Authors

Craig Packer, Margaret Kosmala, Hilary S. Cooley, Henry Brink, Lilian Pintea, David Garshelis, Gianetta Purchase, Megan Strauss, Alexandra Swanson, Guy Balme, Luke Hunter, Kristin Nowell

Abstract

Sport hunting has provided important economic incentives for conserving large predators since the early 1970's, but wildlife managers also face substantial pressure to reduce depredation. Sport hunting is an inherently risky strategy for controlling predators as carnivore populations are difficult to monitor and some species show a propensity for infanticide that is exacerbated by removing adult males. Simulation models predict population declines from even moderate levels of hunting in infanticidal species, and harvest data suggest that African countries and U.S. states with the highest intensity of sport hunting have shown the steepest population declines in African lions and cougars over the past 25 yrs. Similar effects in African leopards may have been masked by mesopredator release owing to declines in sympatric lion populations, whereas there is no evidence of overhunting in non-infanticidal populations of American black bears. Effective conservation of these animals will require new harvest strategies and improved monitoring to counter demands for predator control by livestock producers and local communities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 675 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 12 2%
United States 8 1%
Brazil 7 1%
India 4 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Romania 2 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Other 13 2%
Unknown 621 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 117 17%
Student > Master 117 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 106 16%
Student > Bachelor 104 15%
Student > Postgraduate 29 4%
Other 102 15%
Unknown 100 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 320 47%
Environmental Science 152 23%
Social Sciences 20 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 1%
Other 42 6%
Unknown 114 17%