↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

The Alliance Hypothesis for Human Friendship

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
11 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
213 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
The Alliance Hypothesis for Human Friendship
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0005802
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter DeScioli, Robert Kurzban

Abstract

Exploration of the cognitive systems underlying human friendship will be advanced by identifying the evolved functions these systems perform. Here we propose that human friendship is caused, in part, by cognitive mechanisms designed to assemble support groups for potential conflicts. We use game theory to identify computations about friends that can increase performance in multi-agent conflicts. This analysis suggests that people would benefit from: 1) ranking friends, 2) hiding friend-ranking, and 3) ranking friends according to their own position in partners' rankings. These possible tactics motivate the hypotheses that people possess egocentric and allocentric representations of the social world, that people are motivated to conceal this information, and that egocentric friend-ranking is determined by allocentric representations of partners' friend-rankings (more than others' traits).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
United Kingdom 5 2%
Netherlands 3 1%
Hungary 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 191 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 22%
Student > Bachelor 37 17%
Student > Master 25 12%
Researcher 24 11%
Professor 19 9%
Other 48 23%
Unknown 14 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 88 41%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 15%
Social Sciences 31 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 3%
Other 26 12%
Unknown 23 11%