↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Discrepancy between Cranial and DNA Data of Early Americans: Implications for American Peopling

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Discrepancy between Cranial and DNA Data of Early Americans: Implications for American Peopling
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0005746
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. Ivan Perez, Valeria Bernal, Paula N. Gonzalez, Marina Sardi, Gustavo G. Politis

Abstract

Currently, one of the major debates about the American peopling focuses on the number of populations that originated the biological diversity found in the continent during the Holocene. The studies of craniometric variation in American human remains dating from that period have shown morphological differences between the earliest settlers of the continent and some of the later Amerindian populations. This led some investigators to suggest that these groups--known as Paleomericans and Amerindians respectively--may have arisen from two biologically different populations. On the other hand, most DNA studies performed over extant and ancient populations suggest a single migration of a population from Northeast Asia. Comparing craniometric and mtDNA data of diachronic samples from East Central Argentina dated from 8,000 to 400 years BP, we show here that even when the oldest individuals display traits attributable to Paleoamerican crania, they present the same mtDNA haplogroups as later populations with Amerindian morphology. A possible explanation for these results could be that the craniofacial differentiation was a local phenomenon resulting from random (i.e. genetic drift) and non-random factors (e.g. selection and plasticity). Local processes of morphological differentiation in America are a probable scenario if we take into consideration the rapid peopling and the great ecological diversity of this continent; nevertheless we will discuss alternative explanations as well.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Argentina 5 4%
United States 3 3%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 106 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 22%
Researcher 25 21%
Student > Master 15 13%
Professor 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Other 25 21%
Unknown 9 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 54 45%
Social Sciences 29 24%
Arts and Humanities 10 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 3%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 9 8%