↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Sustainable Phosphorus Loadings from Effective and Cost-Effective Phosphorus Management Around the Baltic Sea

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Sustainable Phosphorus Loadings from Effective and Cost-Effective Phosphorus Management Around the Baltic Sea
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0005417
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andreas C. Bryhn

Abstract

Nutrient over-enrichment of the Baltic Sea, accompanied by intensified algal blooms and decreasing water clarity, has aroused widespread concern in the surrounding countries during the last four decades. This work has used a well-tested dynamic mass-balance model to investigate which decrease in total phosphorus loading would be required to meet the environmental goal to restore the trophic state in the Baltic Sea to pre-1960s levels. Furthermore, the extent to which various abatement options may decrease the phosphorus loading in a cost-effective manner has been studied. Upgrading urban sewage treatment in the catchment could, alone or in combination with banning phosphates in detergents, be sufficient to meet the set environmental goal, at an estimated annual basin-wide cost of 0.21-0.43 billion euro. Such a plan would potentially decrease the total phosphorus loading to the Baltic Sea with 6,650-10,200 tons per year.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 3%
Sweden 1 3%
Unknown 27 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 21%
Student > Bachelor 6 21%
Student > Master 4 14%
Other 3 10%
Researcher 3 10%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 3 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 7 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 21%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 14%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 14%
Engineering 3 10%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 4 14%