↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Lip-Reading Aids Word Recognition Most in Moderate Noise: A Bayesian Explanation Using High-Dimensional Feature Space

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
141 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
220 Mendeley
citeulike
8 CiteULike
Title
Lip-Reading Aids Word Recognition Most in Moderate Noise: A Bayesian Explanation Using High-Dimensional Feature Space
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0004638
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wei Ji, Xiang Zhou, Lars A. Ross, John J. Foxe, Lucas C. Parra

Abstract

Watching a speaker's facial movements can dramatically enhance our ability to comprehend words, especially in noisy environments. From a general doctrine of combining information from different sensory modalities (the principle of inverse effectiveness), one would expect that the visual signals would be most effective at the highest levels of auditory noise. In contrast, we find, in accord with a recent paper, that visual information improves performance more at intermediate levels of auditory noise than at the highest levels, and we show that a novel visual stimulus containing only temporal information does the same. We present a Bayesian model of optimal cue integration that can explain these conflicts. In this model, words are regarded as points in a multidimensional space and word recognition is a probabilistic inference process. When the dimensionality of the feature space is low, the Bayesian model predicts inverse effectiveness; when the dimensionality is high, the enhancement is maximal at intermediate auditory noise levels. When the auditory and visual stimuli differ slightly in high noise, the model makes a counterintuitive prediction: as sound quality increases, the proportion of reported words corresponding to the visual stimulus should first increase and then decrease. We confirm this prediction in a behavioral experiment. We conclude that auditory-visual speech perception obeys the same notion of optimality previously observed only for simple multisensory stimuli.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 4%
Germany 6 3%
United Kingdom 6 3%
Canada 3 1%
Finland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 190 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 25%
Researcher 55 25%
Student > Bachelor 25 11%
Student > Master 20 9%
Professor 13 6%
Other 35 16%
Unknown 16 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 80 36%
Neuroscience 31 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 9%
Computer Science 15 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 6%
Other 38 17%
Unknown 24 11%