↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

The Maintenance of Traditions in Marmosets: Individual Habit, Not Social Conformity? A Field Experiment

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The Maintenance of Traditions in Marmosets: Individual Habit, Not Social Conformity? A Field Experiment
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0004472
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mario B. Pesendorfer, Tina Gunhold, Nicola Schiel, Antonio Souto, Ludwig Huber, Friederike Range

Abstract

Social conformity is a cornerstone of human culture because it accelerates and maintains the spread of behaviour within a group. Few empirical studies have investigated the role of social conformity in the maintenance of traditions despite an increasing body of literature on the formation of behavioural patterns in non-human animals. The current report presents a field experiment with free-ranging marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) which investigated whether social conformity is necessary for the maintenance of behavioural patterns within groups or whether individual effects such as habit formation would suffice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Austria 2 2%
Hungary 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 93 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 26%
Researcher 22 22%
Student > Master 22 22%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Professor 7 7%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 8 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 54 53%
Psychology 14 14%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Neuroscience 4 4%
Environmental Science 4 4%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 13 13%