↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Population and Individual Elephant Response to a Catastrophic Fire in Pilanesberg National Park

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Population and Individual Elephant Response to a Catastrophic Fire in Pilanesberg National Park
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2008
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0003233
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leigh-Ann Woolley, Joshua J. Millspaugh, Rami J. Woods, Samantha Janse van Rensburg, Robin L. Mackey, Bruce Page, Rob Slotow

Abstract

In predator-free large herbivore populations, where density-dependent feedbacks occur at the limit where forage resources can no longer support the population, environmental catastrophes may play a significant role in population regulation. The potential role of fire as a stochastic mass-mortality event limiting these populations is poorly understood, so too the behavioural and physiological responses of the affected animals to this type of large disturbance event. During September 2005, a wildfire resulted in mortality of 29 (18% population mortality) and injury to 18, African elephants in Pilanesberg National Park, South Africa. We examined movement and herd association patterns of six GPS-collared breeding herds, and evaluated population physiological response through faecal glucocorticoid metabolite (stress) levels. We investigated population size, structure and projected growth rates using a simulation model. After an initial flight response post-fire, severely injured breeding herds reduced daily displacement with increased daily variability, reduced home range size, spent more time in non-tourist areas and associated less with other herds. Uninjured, or less severely injured, breeding herds also shifted into non-tourist areas post-fire, but in contrast, increased displacement rate (both mean and variability), did not adjust home range size and formed larger herds post-fire. Adult cow stress hormone levels increased significantly post-fire, whereas juvenile and adult bull stress levels did not change significantly. Most mortality occurred to the juvenile age class causing a change in post-fire population age structure. Projected population growth rate remained unchanged at 6.5% p.a., and at current fecundity levels, the population would reach its previous level three to four years post-fire. The natural mortality patterns seen in elephant populations during stochastic events, such as droughts, follows that of the classic mortality pattern seen in predator-free large ungulate populations, i.e. mainly involving juveniles. Fire therefore functions in a similar manner to other environmental catastrophes and may be a natural mechanism contributing to population limitation. Welfare concerns of arson fires, burning during "hot-fire" conditions and the conservation implications of fire suppression (i.e. removal of a potential contributing factor to natural population regulation) should be integrated into fire management strategies for conservation areas.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Botswana 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 129 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 18%
Student > Master 16 12%
Student > Bachelor 15 11%
Other 14 10%
Other 21 15%
Unknown 18 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 61 45%
Environmental Science 36 26%
Psychology 4 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 1%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 1%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 22 16%