↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Mitochondrial and Nuclear Genes Suggest that Stony Corals Are Monophyletic but Most Families of Stony Corals Are Not (Order Scleractinia, Class Anthozoa, Phylum Cnidaria)

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
260 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
385 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Mitochondrial and Nuclear Genes Suggest that Stony Corals Are Monophyletic but Most Families of Stony Corals Are Not (Order Scleractinia, Class Anthozoa, Phylum Cnidaria)
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2008
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0003222
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hironobu Fukami, Chaolun Allen Chen, Ann F. Budd, Allen Collins, Carden Wallace, Yao-Yang Chuang, Chienhsun Chen, Chang-Feng Dai, Kenji Iwao, Charles Sheppard, Nancy Knowlton

Abstract

Modern hard corals (Class Hexacorallia; Order Scleractinia) are widely studied because of their fundamental role in reef building and their superb fossil record extending back to the Triassic. Nevertheless, interpretations of their evolutionary relationships have been in flux for over a decade. Recent analyses undermine the legitimacy of traditional suborders, families and genera, and suggest that a non-skeletal sister clade (Order Corallimorpharia) might be imbedded within the stony corals. However, these studies either sampled a relatively limited array of taxa or assembled trees from heterogeneous data sets. Here we provide a more comprehensive analysis of Scleractinia (127 species, 75 genera, 17 families) and various outgroups, based on two mitochondrial genes (cytochrome oxidase I, cytochrome b), with analyses of nuclear genes (ss-tubulin, ribosomal DNA) of a subset of taxa to test unexpected relationships. Eleven of 16 families were found to be polyphyletic. Strikingly, over one third of all families as conventionally defined contain representatives from the highly divergent "robust" and "complex" clades. However, the recent suggestion that corallimorpharians are true corals that have lost their skeletons was not upheld. Relationships were supported not only by mitochondrial and nuclear genes, but also often by morphological characters which had been ignored or never noted previously. The concordance of molecular characters and more carefully examined morphological characters suggests a future of greater taxonomic stability, as well as the potential to trace the evolutionary history of this ecologically important group using fossils.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 385 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
Germany 3 <1%
Mexico 3 <1%
Malaysia 3 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Other 9 2%
Unknown 353 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 93 24%
Researcher 89 23%
Student > Master 57 15%
Student > Bachelor 35 9%
Other 22 6%
Other 60 16%
Unknown 29 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 237 62%
Environmental Science 47 12%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 28 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 <1%
Other 14 4%
Unknown 33 9%