↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Attitudes Toward Consumption and Conservation of Tigers in China

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
273 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Attitudes Toward Consumption and Conservation of Tigers in China
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2008
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0002544
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brian Gratwicke, Judy Mills, Adam Dutton, Grace Gabriel, Barney Long, John Seidensticker, Belinda Wright, Wang You, Li Zhang

Abstract

A heated debate has recently emerged between tiger farmers and conservationists about the potential consequences of lifting the ban on trade in farmed tiger products in China. This debate has caused unfounded speculation about the extent of the potential market for tiger products. To fill this knowledge gap, we surveyed 1880 residents from a total of six Chinese cities to understand Urban Chinese tiger consumption behavior, knowledge of trade issues and attitudes towards tiger conservation. We found that 43% of respondents had consumed some product alleged to contain tiger parts. Within this user-group, 71% said that they preferred wild products over farmed ones. The two predominant products used were tiger bone plasters (38%) and tiger bone wine (6.4%). 88% of respondents knew that it was illegal to buy or sell tiger products, and 93% agreed that a ban in trade of tiger parts was necessary to conserve wild tigers. These results indicate that while Urban Chinese people are generally supportive of tiger conservation, there is a huge residual demand for tiger products that could resurge if the ban on trade in tiger parts is lifted in China. We suspect that the current supply of the market is predominantly met by fakes or substitutes branded as tiger medicines, but not listing tiger as an ingredient. We suggest that the Traditional Chinese Medicine community should consider re-branding these products as bone-healing medicines in order to reduce the residual demand for real tiger parts over the long-term. The lifting of the current ban on trade in farmed tiger parts may cause a surge in demand for wild tiger parts that consumers say are better. Because of the low input costs associated with poaching, wild-sourced parts would consistently undercut the prices of farmed tigers that could easily be laundered on a legal market. We therefore recommend that the Chinese authorities maintain the ban on trade in tiger parts, and work to improve the enforcement of the existing ban.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 273 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 3 1%
United States 3 1%
Indonesia 2 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Mozambique 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 257 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 53 19%
Researcher 45 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 15%
Student > Bachelor 32 12%
Student > Postgraduate 19 7%
Other 39 14%
Unknown 44 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 97 36%
Environmental Science 75 27%
Social Sciences 10 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 8 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 2%
Other 31 11%
Unknown 47 17%