Title |
Are There Better Methods of Monitoring MRSA Control than Bacteraemia Surveillance? An Observational Database Study
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, June 2008
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0002378 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sarah Walker, Tim E. A. Peto, Lily O'Connor, Derrick W. Crook, David Wyllie |
Abstract |
Despite a substantial burden of non-bacteraemic methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) disease, most MRSA surveillance schemes are based on bacteraemias. Using bacteraemia as an outcome, trends at hospital level are difficult to discern, due to random variation. We investigated rates of nosocomial bacteraemic and non-bacteraemic MRSA infection as surveillance outcomes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 3% |
Nigeria | 1 | 3% |
Australia | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 30 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 18% |
Student > Master | 5 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 12% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Unknown | 9 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 33% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 15% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 6% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 11 | 33% |