↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Are There Better Methods of Monitoring MRSA Control than Bacteraemia Surveillance? An Observational Database Study

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Are There Better Methods of Monitoring MRSA Control than Bacteraemia Surveillance? An Observational Database Study
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2008
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0002378
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah Walker, Tim E. A. Peto, Lily O'Connor, Derrick W. Crook, David Wyllie

Abstract

Despite a substantial burden of non-bacteraemic methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) disease, most MRSA surveillance schemes are based on bacteraemias. Using bacteraemia as an outcome, trends at hospital level are difficult to discern, due to random variation. We investigated rates of nosocomial bacteraemic and non-bacteraemic MRSA infection as surveillance outcomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Nigeria 1 3%
Australia 1 3%
Unknown 30 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 18%
Student > Master 5 15%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Other 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 9 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 15%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 6%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 11 33%