Title |
A Comparison of Phylogenetic Network Methods Using Computer Simulation
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, April 2008
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0001913 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Steven M. Woolley, David Posada, Keith A. Crandall |
Abstract |
We present a series of simulation studies that explore the relative performance of several phylogenetic network approaches (statistical parsimony, split decomposition, union of maximum parsimony trees, neighbor-net, simulated history recombination upper bound, median-joining, reduced median joining and minimum spanning network) compared to standard tree approaches, (neighbor-joining and maximum parsimony) in the presence and absence of recombination. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 67% |
Canada | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 388 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 9 | 2% |
Brazil | 8 | 2% |
Portugal | 6 | 2% |
Germany | 5 | 1% |
Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
Spain | 3 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Ireland | 1 | <1% |
Other | 14 | 4% |
Unknown | 336 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 120 | 31% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 79 | 20% |
Student > Master | 46 | 12% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 24 | 6% |
Professor | 23 | 6% |
Other | 70 | 18% |
Unknown | 26 | 7% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 252 | 65% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 35 | 9% |
Computer Science | 17 | 4% |
Environmental Science | 12 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 1% |
Other | 30 | 8% |
Unknown | 37 | 10% |