↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Morphological Evolution of Spiders Predicted by Pendulum Mechanics

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
Title
Morphological Evolution of Spiders Predicted by Pendulum Mechanics
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2008
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0001841
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jordi Moya-Laraño, Dejan Vinković, Eva De Mas, Guadalupe Corcobado, Eulalia Moreno

Abstract

Animals have been hypothesized to benefit from pendulum mechanics during suspensory locomotion, in which the potential energy of gravity is converted into kinetic energy according to the energy-conservation principle. However, no convincing evidence has been found so far. Demonstrating that morphological evolution follows pendulum mechanics is important from a biomechanical point of view because during suspensory locomotion some morphological traits could be decoupled from gravity, thus allowing independent adaptive morphological evolution of these two traits when compared to animals that move standing on their legs; i.e., as inverted pendulums. If the evolution of body shape matches simple pendulum mechanics, animals that move suspending their bodies should evolve relatively longer legs which must confer high moving capabilities.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 4%
United States 4 4%
Mexico 2 2%
Australia 1 1%
Singapore 1 1%
Réunion 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 82 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 24%
Researcher 18 19%
Student > Master 13 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Other 20 21%
Unknown 4 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 63 65%
Environmental Science 9 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Engineering 3 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 2%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 10 10%