↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Ancient DNA Elucidates the Controversy about the Flightless Island Hens (Gallinula sp.) of Tristan da Cunha

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Ancient DNA Elucidates the Controversy about the Flightless Island Hens (Gallinula sp.) of Tristan da Cunha
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2008
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0001835
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dick S. J. Groenenberg, Albert J. Beintema, René W. R. J. Dekker, Edmund Gittenberger

Abstract

A persistent controversy surrounds the flightless island hen of Tristan da Cunha, Gallinula nesiotis. Some believe that it became extinct by the end of the 19th century. Others suppose that it still inhabits Tristan. There is no consensus about Gallinula comeri, the name introduced for the flightless moorhen from the nearby island of Gough. On the basis of DNA sequencing of both recently collected and historical material, we conclude that G. nesiotis and G. comeri are different taxa, that G. nesiotis indeed became extinct, and that G. comeri now inhabits both islands. This study confirms that among gallinules seemingly radical adaptations (such as the loss of flight) can readily evolve in parallel on different islands, while conspicuous changes in other morphological characters fail to occur.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 32 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 15%
Student > Master 4 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Other 2 6%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 4 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 68%
Environmental Science 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 15%