↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

PAX4 Enhances Beta-Cell Differentiation of Human Embryonic Stem Cells

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
PAX4 Enhances Beta-Cell Differentiation of Human Embryonic Stem Cells
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2008
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0001783
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chee Gee Liew, Nadia N. Shah, Sarah J. Briston, Ruth M. Shepherd, Cheen Peen Khoo, Mark J. Dunne, Harry D. Moore, Karen E. Cosgrove, Peter W. Andrews

Abstract

Human embryonic stem cells (HESC) readily differentiate into an apparently haphazard array of cell types, corresponding to all three germ layers, when their culture conditions are altered, for example by growth in suspension as aggregates known as embryoid bodies (EBs). However, this diversity of differentiation means that the efficiency of producing any one particular cell type is inevitably low. Although pancreatic differentiation has been reported from HESC, practicable applications for the use of beta-cells derived from HESC to treat diabetes will only be possible once techniques are developed to promote efficient differentiation along the pancreatic lineages.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
China 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 66 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 21%
Student > Bachelor 13 19%
Researcher 12 17%
Student > Master 7 10%
Professor 5 7%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 9 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 11%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Engineering 3 4%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 11 16%