↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Effectiveness of Journal Ranking Schemes as a Tool for Locating Information

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
156 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
Title
Effectiveness of Journal Ranking Schemes as a Tool for Locating Information
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2008
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0001683
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael J. Stringer, Marta Sales-Pardo, Luís A. Nunes Amaral

Abstract

The rise of electronic publishing, preprint archives, blogs, and wikis is raising concerns among publishers, editors, and scientists about the present day relevance of academic journals and traditional peer review. These concerns are especially fuelled by the ability of search engines to automatically identify and sort information. It appears that academic journals can only remain relevant if acceptance of research for publication within a journal allows readers to infer immediate, reliable information on the value of that research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 15 10%
Germany 3 2%
United Kingdom 3 2%
Spain 2 1%
Australia 2 1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 114 78%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 18%
Librarian 12 8%
Other 12 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 6%
Other 36 24%
Unknown 17 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 14%
Computer Science 19 13%
Social Sciences 19 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 8%
Physics and Astronomy 11 7%
Other 44 30%
Unknown 21 14%