↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Auditory ERPs to Stimulus Deviance in an Awake Chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes): Towards Hominid Cognitive Neurosciences

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
Title
Auditory ERPs to Stimulus Deviance in an Awake Chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes): Towards Hominid Cognitive Neurosciences
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2008
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0001442
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ari Ueno, Satoshi Hirata, Kohki Fuwa, Keiko Sugama, Kiyo Kusunoki, Goh Matsuda, Hirokata Fukushima, Kazuo Hiraki, Masaki Tomonaga, Toshikazu Hasegawa

Abstract

For decades, the chimpanzee, phylogenetically closest to humans, has been analyzed intensively in comparative cognitive studies. Other than the accumulation of behavioral data, the neural basis for cognitive processing in the chimpanzee remains to be clarified. To increase our knowledge on the evolutionary and neural basis of human cognition, comparative neurophysiological studies exploring endogenous neural activities in the awake state are needed. However, to date, such studies have rarely been reported in non-human hominid species, due to the practical difficulties in conducting non-invasive measurements on awake individuals.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hungary 2 3%
Japan 2 3%
Netherlands 1 1%
France 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 65 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 14%
Student > Master 9 13%
Other 6 8%
Professor 4 6%
Other 16 22%
Unknown 8 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 24 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 25%
Unspecified 7 10%
Arts and Humanities 4 6%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 10 14%