↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Proprioceptive Movement Illusions Due to Prolonged Stimulation: Reversals and Aftereffects

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2007
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Proprioceptive Movement Illusions Due to Prolonged Stimulation: Reversals and Aftereffects
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2007
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0001037
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tatjana Seizova-Cajic, Janette L. Smith, Janet L. Taylor, Simon C. Gandevia

Abstract

Adaptation to constant stimulation has often been used to investigate the mechanisms of perceptual coding, but the adaptive processes within the proprioceptive channels that encode body movement have not been well described. We investigated them using vibration as a stimulus because vibration of muscle tendons results in a powerful illusion of movement. We applied sustained 90 Hz vibratory stimulation to biceps brachii, an elbow flexor and induced the expected illusion of elbow extension (in 12 participants). There was clear evidence of adaptation to the movement signal both during the 6-min long vibration and on its cessation. During vibration, the strong initial illusion of extension waxed and waned, with diminishing duration of periods of illusory movement and occasional reversals in the direction of the illusion. After vibration there was an aftereffect in which the stationary elbow seemed to move into flexion. Muscle activity shows no consistent relationship with the variations in perceived movement. We interpret the observed effects as adaptive changes in the central mechanisms that code movement in direction-selective opponent channels.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 2 2%
United States 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 104 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 22%
Researcher 22 20%
Student > Bachelor 14 13%
Student > Master 13 12%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Other 17 16%
Unknown 13 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 20 18%
Psychology 18 17%
Neuroscience 15 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 7%
Other 19 17%
Unknown 17 16%