↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Optimality Driven Nearest Centroid Classification from Genomic Data

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Optimality Driven Nearest Centroid Classification from Genomic Data
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2007
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0001002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alan R. Dabney, John D. Storey

Abstract

Nearest-centroid classifiers have recently been successfully employed in high-dimensional applications, such as in genomics. A necessary step when building a classifier for high-dimensional data is feature selection. Feature selection is frequently carried out by computing univariate scores for each feature individually, without consideration for how a subset of features performs as a whole. We introduce a new feature selection approach for high-dimensional nearest centroid classifiers that instead is based on the theoretically optimal choice of a given number of features, which we determine directly here. This allows us to develop a new greedy algorithm to estimate this optimal nearest-centroid classifier with a given number of features. In addition, whereas the centroids are usually formed from maximum likelihood estimates, we investigate the applicability of high-dimensional shrinkage estimates of centroids. We apply the proposed method to clinical classification based on gene-expression microarrays, demonstrating that the proposed method can outperform existing nearest centroid classifiers.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 9%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 45 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 34%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 3 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 25%
Computer Science 9 17%
Mathematics 7 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 6%
Engineering 3 6%
Other 13 25%
Unknown 5 9%