↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Studying Seabird Diet through Genetic Analysis of Faeces: A Case Study on Macaroni Penguins (Eudyptes chrysolophus)

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
384 Mendeley
Title
Studying Seabird Diet through Genetic Analysis of Faeces: A Case Study on Macaroni Penguins (Eudyptes chrysolophus)
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2007
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0000831
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bruce E. Deagle, Nick J. Gales, Karen Evans, Simon N. Jarman, Sarah Robinson, Rowan Trebilco, Mark A. Hindell

Abstract

Determination of seabird diet usually relies on the analysis of stomach-content remains obtained through stomach flushing; this technique is both invasive and logistically difficult. We evaluate the usefulness of DNA-based faecal analysis in a dietary study on chick-rearing macaroni penguins (Eudyptes chrysolophus) at Heard Island. Conventional stomach-content data was also collected, allowing comparison of the approaches.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 384 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
Australia 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Other 6 2%
Unknown 360 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 102 27%
Researcher 70 18%
Student > Master 68 18%
Student > Bachelor 27 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 4%
Other 52 14%
Unknown 49 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 211 55%
Environmental Science 71 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 7%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 <1%
Other 14 4%
Unknown 55 14%