↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Biometric Evidence that Sexual Selection Has Shaped the Hominin Face

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
4 blogs
twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
199 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
268 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Biometric Evidence that Sexual Selection Has Shaped the Hominin Face
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2007
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0000710
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eleanor M. Weston, Adrian E. Friday, Pietro Liò

Abstract

We consider sex differences in human facial morphology in the context of developmental change. We show that at puberty, the height of the upper face, between the lip and the brow, develops differently in males and females, and that these differences are not explicable in terms of sex differences in body size. We find the same dimorphism in the faces of human ancestors. We propose that the relative shortening in men and lengthening in women of the anterior upper face at puberty is the mechanistic consequence of extreme maxillary rotation during ontogeny. A link between this developmental model and sexual dimorphism is made for the first time, and provides a new set of morphological criteria to sex human crania. This finding has important implications for the role of sexual selection in the evolution of anthropoid faces and for theories of human facial attractiveness.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 268 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 6 2%
Japan 3 1%
France 2 <1%
Poland 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Czechia 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 244 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 19%
Student > Bachelor 38 14%
Researcher 32 12%
Student > Master 28 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 21 8%
Other 60 22%
Unknown 39 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 82 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 61 23%
Social Sciences 19 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 12 4%
Other 35 13%
Unknown 44 16%