↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Gender Differences in Publication Output: Towards an Unbiased Metric of Research Performance

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, December 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
5 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
29 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
212 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
237 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Gender Differences in Publication Output: Towards an Unbiased Metric of Research Performance
Published in
PLOS ONE, December 2006
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0000127
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew R.E. Symonds, Neil J. Gemmell, Tamsin L. Braisher, Kylie L. Gorringe, Mark A. Elgar

Abstract

We examined the publication records of a cohort of 168 life scientists in the field of ecology and evolutionary biology to assess gender differences in research performance. Clear discrepancies in publication rate between men and women appear very early in their careers and this has consequences for the subsequent citation of their work. We show that a recently proposed index designed to rank scientists fairly is in fact strongly biased against female researchers, and advocate a modified index to assess men and women on a more equitable basis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 237 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Australia 3 1%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Other 6 3%
Unknown 213 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 47 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 19%
Student > Master 30 13%
Student > Bachelor 16 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 6%
Other 51 22%
Unknown 32 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 52 22%
Social Sciences 38 16%
Environmental Science 18 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 17 7%
Psychology 15 6%
Other 51 22%
Unknown 46 19%