↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

MODMatcher: Multi-Omics Data Matcher for Integrative Genomic Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
20 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
MODMatcher: Multi-Omics Data Matcher for Integrative Genomic Analysis
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, August 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003790
Pubmed ID
Authors

Seungyeul Yoo, Tao Huang, Joshua D. Campbell, Eunjee Lee, Zhidong Tu, Mark W. Geraci, Charles A. Powell, Eric E. Schadt, Avrum Spira, Jun Zhu

Abstract

Errors in sample annotation or labeling often occur in large-scale genetic or genomic studies and are difficult to avoid completely during data generation and management. For integrative genomic studies, it is critical to identify and correct these errors. Different types of genetic and genomic data are inter-connected by cis-regulations. On that basis, we developed a computational approach, Multi-Omics Data Matcher (MODMatcher), to identify and correct sample labeling errors in multiple types of molecular data, which can be used in further integrative analysis. Our results indicate that inspection of sample annotation and labeling error is an indispensable data quality assurance step. Applied to a large lung genomic study, MODMatcher increased statistically significant genetic associations and genomic correlations by more than two-fold. In a simulation study, MODMatcher provided more robust results by using three types of omics data than two types of omics data. We further demonstrate that MODMatcher can be broadly applied to large genomic data sets containing multiple types of omics data, such as The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data sets.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 6%
Turkey 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Argentina 1 1%
Unknown 75 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 34%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 20%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Professor 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 9 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 12%
Computer Science 5 6%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 12 14%