↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Optimal Behavioral Hierarchy

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 X users

Readers on

mendeley
295 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
Title
Optimal Behavioral Hierarchy
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, August 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003779
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alec Solway, Carlos Diuk, Natalia Córdova, Debbie Yee, Andrew G. Barto, Yael Niv, Matthew M. Botvinick

Abstract

Human behavior has long been recognized to display hierarchical structure: actions fit together into subtasks, which cohere into extended goal-directed activities. Arranging actions hierarchically has well established benefits, allowing behaviors to be represented efficiently by the brain, and allowing solutions to new tasks to be discovered easily. However, these payoffs depend on the particular way in which actions are organized into a hierarchy, the specific way in which tasks are carved up into subtasks. We provide a mathematical account for what makes some hierarchies better than others, an account that allows an optimal hierarchy to be identified for any set of tasks. We then present results from four behavioral experiments, suggesting that human learners spontaneously discover optimal action hierarchies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 295 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 2%
Spain 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 276 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 88 30%
Researcher 54 18%
Student > Bachelor 35 12%
Student > Master 34 12%
Student > Postgraduate 15 5%
Other 32 11%
Unknown 37 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 57 19%
Psychology 56 19%
Computer Science 49 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 13%
Engineering 17 6%
Other 29 10%
Unknown 49 17%