↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Spatially Distributed Dendritic Resonance Selectively Filters Synaptic Input

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Spatially Distributed Dendritic Resonance Selectively Filters Synaptic Input
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, August 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003775
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan Laudanski, Benjamin Torben-Nielsen, Idan Segev, Shihab Shamma

Abstract

An important task performed by a neuron is the selection of relevant inputs from among thousands of synapses impinging on the dendritic tree. Synaptic plasticity enables this by strenghtening a subset of synapses that are, presumably, functionally relevant to the neuron. A different selection mechanism exploits the resonance of the dendritic membranes to preferentially filter synaptic inputs based on their temporal rates. A widely held view is that a neuron has one resonant frequency and thus can pass through one rate. Here we demonstrate through mathematical analyses and numerical simulations that dendritic resonance is inevitably a spatially distributed property; and therefore the resonance frequency varies along the dendrites, and thus endows neurons with a powerful spatiotemporal selection mechanism that is sensitive both to the dendritic location and the temporal structure of the incoming synaptic inputs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 4%
Uruguay 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
France 1 1%
India 1 1%
Belarus 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 60 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 37%
Student > Master 10 14%
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Professor 4 6%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 6 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 30%
Neuroscience 16 23%
Engineering 8 11%
Mathematics 3 4%
Computer Science 3 4%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 9 13%