Title |
Phenotypic Signatures Arising from Unbalanced Bacterial Growth
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLoS Computational Biology, August 2014
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003751 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Cheemeng Tan, Robert Phillip Smith, Ming-Chi Tsai, Russell Schwartz, Lingchong You |
Abstract |
Fluctuations in the growth rate of a bacterial culture during unbalanced growth are generally considered undesirable in quantitative studies of bacterial physiology. Under well-controlled experimental conditions, however, these fluctuations are not random but instead reflect the interplay between intra-cellular networks underlying bacterial growth and the growth environment. Therefore, these fluctuations could be considered quantitative phenotypes of the bacteria under a specific growth condition. Here, we present a method to identify "phenotypic signatures" by time-frequency analysis of unbalanced growth curves measured with high temporal resolution. The signatures are then applied to differentiate amongst different bacterial strains or the same strain under different growth conditions, and to identify the essential architecture of the gene network underlying the observed growth dynamics. Our method has implications for both basic understanding of bacterial physiology and for the classification of bacterial strains. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | 20% |
Japan | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 4 | 80% |
Members of the public | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 4% |
Germany | 2 | 4% |
Portugal | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 42 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 34% |
Researcher | 13 | 28% |
Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
Professor | 2 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 9% |
Unknown | 5 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 40% |
Engineering | 7 | 15% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 9% |
Computer Science | 3 | 6% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 9% |
Unknown | 8 | 17% |