↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Membrane Interaction of Bound Ligands Contributes to the Negative Binding Cooperativity of the EGF Receptor

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Membrane Interaction of Bound Ligands Contributes to the Negative Binding Cooperativity of the EGF Receptor
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, July 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003742
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anton Arkhipov, Yibing Shan, Eric T. Kim, David E. Shaw

Abstract

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) plays a key role in regulating cell proliferation, migration, and differentiation, and aberrant EGFR signaling is implicated in a variety of cancers. EGFR signaling is triggered by extracellular ligand binding, which promotes EGFR dimerization and activation. Ligand-binding measurements are consistent with a negatively cooperative model in which the ligand-binding affinity at either binding site in an EGFR dimer is weaker when the other site is occupied by a ligand. This cooperativity is widely believed to be central to the effects of ligand concentration on EGFR-mediated intracellular signaling. Although the extracellular portion of the human EGFR dimer has been resolved crystallographically, the crystal structures do not reveal the structural origin of this negative cooperativity, which has remained unclear. Here we report the results of molecular dynamics simulations suggesting that asymmetrical interactions of the two binding sites with the membrane may be responsible (perhaps along with other factors) for this negative cooperativity. In particular, in our simulations the extracellular domains of an EGFR dimer spontaneously lay down on the membrane in an orientation in which favorable membrane contacts were made with one of the bound ligands, but could not be made with the other. Similar interactions were observed when EGFR was glycosylated, as it is in vivo.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 3%
United Kingdom 2 3%
India 1 1%
France 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Unknown 64 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 31%
Researcher 19 26%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Student > Master 5 7%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 8 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 35%
Chemistry 12 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 14%
Physics and Astronomy 6 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 9 13%