↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Modeling Higher-Order Correlations within Cortical Microcolumns

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
Title
Modeling Higher-Order Correlations within Cortical Microcolumns
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, July 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003684
Pubmed ID
Authors

Urs Köster, Jascha Sohl-Dickstein, Charles M. Gray, Bruno A. Olshausen

Abstract

We statistically characterize the population spiking activity obtained from simultaneous recordings of neurons across all layers of a cortical microcolumn. Three types of models are compared: an Ising model which captures pairwise correlations between units, a Restricted Boltzmann Machine (RBM) which allows for modeling of higher-order correlations, and a semi-Restricted Boltzmann Machine which is a combination of Ising and RBM models. Model parameters were estimated in a fast and efficient manner using minimum probability flow, and log likelihoods were compared using annealed importance sampling. The higher-order models reveal localized activity patterns which reflect the laminar organization of neurons within a cortical column. The higher-order models also outperformed the Ising model in log-likelihood: On populations of 20 cells, the RBM had 10% higher log-likelihood (relative to an independent model) than a pairwise model, increasing to 45% gain in a larger network with 100 spatiotemporal elements, consisting of 10 neurons over 10 time steps. We further removed the need to model stimulus-induced correlations by incorporating a peri-stimulus time histogram term, in which case the higher order models continued to perform best. These results demonstrate the importance of higher-order interactions to describe the structure of correlated activity in cortical networks. Boltzmann Machines with hidden units provide a succinct and effective way to capture these dependencies without increasing the difficulty of model estimation and evaluation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 4%
Switzerland 2 2%
Austria 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Belarus 1 <1%
Unknown 103 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 26%
Researcher 25 22%
Student > Master 17 15%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 19 16%
Unknown 10 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 32 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 24%
Physics and Astronomy 19 16%
Computer Science 17 15%
Engineering 4 3%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 9 8%