↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Building the Future of Bioinformatics through Student-Facilitated Conferencing

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
12 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Building the Future of Bioinformatics through Student-Facilitated Conferencing
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, January 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003458
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kavisha Ramdayal, Miranda D. Stobbe, Tarun Mishra, Magali Michaut

Abstract

Sharing results, techniques, and challenges is paramount to advance our understanding of any field of science. In the scientific community this exchange of ideas is mainly made possible through national and international conferences. Scientists have the opportunity to showcase their work, receive feedback, and improve their presentation skills. However, conferences can be large and intimidating for young researchers. In addition, for many of the more prestigious conferences, the very high number of submissions and low selection rate are major limitations to aspiring young researchers aiming to present their work to the scientific community. To improve student participation and proliferation of information, regional student groups have successfully organized conferences and symposia specifically aimed at students. This gives more students the opportunity to present their work and receive valuable experience and insight from peers and leaders in the field. At the same time, it is an ideal way for students to gain familiarity with the conference experience. In this paper, we highlight some of the benefits of participating in such student conferences, and we review the challenges we have encountered when organizing them. Both topics are illustrated in detail with examples from different ISCB Student Council Regional Student Groups.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 8%
Japan 1 4%
Sweden 1 4%
Brazil 1 4%
Unknown 21 81%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 38%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 19%
Student > Master 3 12%
Lecturer 2 8%
Professor 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 3 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 15%
Social Sciences 2 8%
Computer Science 2 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 6 23%