↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

VBA: A Probabilistic Treatment of Nonlinear Models for Neurobiological and Behavioural Data

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
266 Mendeley
citeulike
8 CiteULike
Title
VBA: A Probabilistic Treatment of Nonlinear Models for Neurobiological and Behavioural Data
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, January 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003441
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jean Daunizeau, Vincent Adam, Lionel Rigoux

Abstract

This work is in line with an on-going effort tending toward a computational (quantitative and refutable) understanding of human neuro-cognitive processes. Many sophisticated models for behavioural and neurobiological data have flourished during the past decade. Most of these models are partly unspecified (i.e. they have unknown parameters) and nonlinear. This makes them difficult to peer with a formal statistical data analysis framework. In turn, this compromises the reproducibility of model-based empirical studies. This work exposes a software toolbox that provides generic, efficient and robust probabilistic solutions to the three problems of model-based analysis of empirical data: (i) data simulation, (ii) parameter estimation/model selection, and (iii) experimental design optimization.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 266 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 257 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 81 30%
Researcher 54 20%
Student > Master 28 11%
Student > Bachelor 22 8%
Student > Postgraduate 15 6%
Other 32 12%
Unknown 34 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 68 26%
Psychology 53 20%
Engineering 20 8%
Computer Science 16 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 6%
Other 34 13%
Unknown 60 23%