↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Flow Cytometry Bioinformatics

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
29 X users
patent
3 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
355 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
Title
Flow Cytometry Bioinformatics
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, December 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003365
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kieran O'Neill, Nima Aghaeepour, Josef Špidlen, Ryan Brinkman

Abstract

Flow cytometry bioinformatics is the application of bioinformatics to flow cytometry data, which involves storing, retrieving, organizing, and analyzing flow cytometry data using extensive computational resources and tools. Flow cytometry bioinformatics requires extensive use of and contributes to the development of techniques from computational statistics and machine learning. Flow cytometry and related methods allow the quantification of multiple independent biomarkers on large numbers of single cells. The rapid growth in the multidimensionality and throughput of flow cytometry data, particularly in the 2000s, has led to the creation of a variety of computational analysis methods, data standards, and public databases for the sharing of results. Computational methods exist to assist in the preprocessing of flow cytometry data, identifying cell populations within it, matching those cell populations across samples, and performing diagnosis and discovery using the results of previous steps. For preprocessing, this includes compensating for spectral overlap, transforming data onto scales conducive to visualization and analysis, assessing data for quality, and normalizing data across samples and experiments. For population identification, tools are available to aid traditional manual identification of populations in two-dimensional scatter plots (gating), to use dimensionality reduction to aid gating, and to find populations automatically in higher dimensional space in a variety of ways. It is also possible to characterize data in more comprehensive ways, such as the density-guided binary space partitioning technique known as probability binning, or by combinatorial gating. Finally, diagnosis using flow cytometry data can be aided by supervised learning techniques, and discovery of new cell types of biological importance by high-throughput statistical methods, as part of pipelines incorporating all of the aforementioned methods. Open standards, data, and software are also key parts of flow cytometry bioinformatics. Data standards include the widely adopted Flow Cytometry Standard (FCS) defining how data from cytometers should be stored, but also several new standards under development by the International Society for Advancement of Cytometry (ISAC) to aid in storing more detailed information about experimental design and analytical steps. Open data is slowly growing with the opening of the CytoBank database in 2010 and FlowRepository in 2012, both of which allow users to freely distribute their data, and the latter of which has been recommended as the preferred repository for MIFlowCyt-compliant data by ISAC. Open software is most widely available in the form of a suite of Bioconductor packages, but is also available for web execution on the GenePattern platform.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 355 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 336 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 87 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 66 19%
Student > Master 48 14%
Student > Bachelor 35 10%
Other 17 5%
Other 56 16%
Unknown 46 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 91 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 53 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 41 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 33 9%
Computer Science 21 6%
Other 59 17%
Unknown 57 16%